Monday, 13 June
|
Opening
|
After opening the meeting, Vladimir Golitsyn, director of DOALOS, noted
that it was time to elect a chair, and that John Roberts of the United
Kingdom had again been put forth as candidate.
|
Speaking for the EU, Hermien Busschbach of the Netherlands supported Mr.
Roberts as candidate for chair.
|
After delegates agreed on his election, John Roberts took the chair and
thanked them for allowing him to continue this work.
|
Plenary
|
UN Legal Advisor Nicolas Michel provided an overview of the establishment
of the GMA, and encouraged participants to bring new life to this endeavor
by focusing on the Assessment of Assessments.
|
Kim Sun Pyo of the Republic of Korea called for the GMA to strengthen
global understanding of the state of the marine environment, stressing
this does not include the management of marine living resources.
|
E. Salif Diop of UNEP suggested taking stock of existing activities, and
of the added value of all relevant UN agencies.
|
Dmitry Gonchar of Russia underlined the need for member States to be
involved in the GMA on a geographic basis.
|
Jake Rice of Canada noted that the GMA is not merely putting together
an inventory of reports, but a critical appraisal of their objectivity,
and stressed the importance of evaluating how effectively they have been
communicated.
|
Tom Laughlin of the United States highlighted that an assessment should
look at global, regional and local assessments, including both governmental
and non-governmental assessments.
|
Jane Willing of New Zealand noted the importance of understanding the
objective and purpose of the discussion, and suggested benchmarking
information and identifying gaps and areas of duplication.
|
Manimuthu Ghandi of India enquired about the integration process for data
arriving in the Assessment of Assessments.
|
Serge Beslier of the European Commission asked whether the Assessment of
Assessments would be arranged globally, or regionally.
|
Alfonso Ascencio of Mexico enquired about the pattern of communication
from the steering committee or task force to governments.
|
Argentina noted that a task force with enough resources can be
ambitious, and encouraged review of resources available to determine
the correct level of ambition.
|
Serge Garcia of FAO said a task force would in fact be a steering group
with a strong governmental and scientific component.
|
Mari Skâre of Norway suggested taking a little more time to reflect
on the composition of the task force, and including representatives from
member States.
|
Norma Taylor Roberts of Jamaica asked what role UN Oceans could play
in the administrative functions of raising funds for the Assessment.
|
Jean-Claude Sainlos of IMO stressed that it has an important role to
play in the dialogue at the General Assembly, and urged avoiding overlaps.
|
|
Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental
Protection (GESAMP) recommended that the initial stage of technical
groups be constrained in size.
|
Umit Unluata of IOC described his agency's collaboration with the GMA,
highlighting its cooperation with UNEP in developing an inventory of
existing assessments.
|
Zhou Yong of China noted that during the first international workshop, the
question of sizing regions for assessment had been greatly debated, and
recommended that it be left to the experts, rather than addressed by the
workshop.
|