Working
Group I continued discussions on strengthening the elaboration and
application of C&I for SFM, concentrating on the following themes:
national-level work and applications; the relationship between
national and subnational-level C&I; linkages with certification;
linkages with monitoring, assessment and reporting; review and
refinement of indicators; and the importance of National Forest
Inventories.
Left photo: Rapporteur Eva Mueller (ITTO) and Chair Christina
Amoako-Nuama (Ghana)
|
|
An Indian participant noted that state governments are
having difficulty with data collection and monitoring and with the
investment required for C&I implementation. Left photo: Delegates
from India during the afternoon plenary session
|
|
On linkages with certification, a participant from
Ecuador commented on socioeconomic realities in his country. He said
the majority of forest owners in Ecuador have limited capacities, and
therefore are unable to meet the high standards necessary for
certification.
|
|
A participant from Trinidad and Tobago said
certification provides a financial incentive for countries to
implement C&I. |
|
Ghana stressed the need to mainstream C&I into NFIs and
NFPs.
|
|
Working Group II:
|
|
Working
Group II continued its discussions with a focus on the following
issues: the meaning of political commitment; ways to promote
commitment at national, sub-national, regional and international
levels; and ways to enhance cooperation between C&I processes and
involve countries not yet participating in C&I initiatives.
Left photo (L-R): Rapporteur Tiina Vahanen (FAO) and WG II Chair
Ingwald Gschwandtl (Austria).
|
|
On
the nature of political commitment, a participant from the US stressed
that meaningful political pressure should come from local communities,
and highlighted that public interest and political commitment depend
on many dynamic factors, and that C&I should reflect the dynamic
changes.
|
|
A
participant from Finland noted that existing political commitment
could provide a basis for working toward an agreement on a common set
of criteria and a common understanding of indicators.
|
|
ATO
representative stressed the need for greater bilateral cooperation to
support national processes.
|
|
A
participant from Uruguay stressed the need for South-South technology
transfer, and highlighted Uruguay's cooperation with Argentina, Cuba
and Chile to this end.
|
|
A
participant from Paraguay called for utilizing existing information
and structures and cooperation between technical experts, highlighting
a relevant FAO information project in the Caribbean and Latin America
region.
|
|
An UNFF representative suggested that the
recommendations and conclusions of CICI 2003 be presented to the UNFF,
including through side events at UNFF-4.
|
|
Plenary: Working Group presentation of
preliminary reports
|
|
Participants suggested a number of textual amendments. They also
discussed whether conclusions and recommendations of the Conference
should address broader issues of sustainability and SFM.
Listen to the Preliminary Reports of Working Group I and II presented
by WG
I Chair Christina Amoako-Nuama (Ghana), and WG
II Chair
Ingwald Gschwandtl (Austria)
(left photo)
|
|
|
At the end of the day, participants heard presentations of
background papers
by
Ravi
Prabhu
on strengthening institutional capacity and
stakeholder partnerships for implementing C&I and facilitating
information exchange between all stakeholders, and by Ewald
Rametsteiner (left photo) on key issues for
the future development of international initiatives on forest-related
C&I for sustainable development. These two background papers will
serve as the basis for working group discussions on Wednesday, 5
Februrary.
|
|
|