SUB-WORKING GROUP I: |
|
|
|
Côte d'Ivoire encouraged exchange of views among indigenous and
local communities on risks associated with development projects,
such as waste disposal.
Above photo: Andre Doh (Côte d'Ivoire)
|
Rwanda stressed that many indigenous and local communities lack
the capacity to evaluate the impacts of projects that are
implemented on their sacred sites, lands and waters.
Above photo: Suzanne Uwimana (Rwanda)
|
|
|
|
|
The IIFB said that local indigenous authorities are not able to
deal with the economic and social impacts of development projects
such as loss of land and resources or resettlements.
Above photo L-R: IIFB representatives Onel Masardule and
Antonieta Castro
|
IUCN stressed that comprehensive assessment procedures are needed
to facilitate the participation of indigenous and local
communities. Above photo: Gonzalo Oviedo (IUCN)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jamaica proposed to conduct general surveys of sacred sites to
avoid damaging sites that are not in use or unknown to the public.
Above photo: Carole Excell (Jamaica)
|
Regarding baseline studies, the US suggested addressing baselines
at the national level.
Above photo: Jeffrey Fisher (US)
|
|
|
|
|
Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) said the link between communities and biodiversity should
be assessed. Above photo: Michael Todishev (RAIPON)
|
The Bahamas suggested addressing the economic valuation of
cultural resources. Above photo: Stacey Wells-Moultrie (The
Bahamas)
|
|
|
|
Sweden suggested ensuring the full participation of affected
communities in the decision-making process, including its review
and appeal.
Above photo: Johan Bodegård (Sweden)
|
The IIFB proposed language differentiating direct and indirect
impacts of development projects, and addressing potential impacts
of invasive alien species. Above photo: Aida Cadiogan and
Lourdes Amos (IIFB)
|
|
SUB-WORKING GROUP
II: |
|
|
|
Costa
Rica stressed the need to strengthen the capacity of local
organizations that are directly involved in addressing
indigenous issues.
Above photo: Donald Rojas (Costa Rica)
|
Ethiopia
said indigenous issues vary depending on countries, and noted
the importance of raising indigenous awareness about their
rights. Above photo: Gima Balcha (Ethiopia)
|
|
|
|
|
New
Zealand did not consider it essential for indigenous and local
communities to make application through their government.
|
Zambia
called for translating and simplifying the language of the CBD to
make it more understandable to indigenous and local
communities. Above photo: Davy Siame (Zambia)
|
|
|
|
|
The
Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism (IPCB) stressed that
indigenous territories are centres of origin of many food crops,
and said GURTs threaten indigenous livelihoods.
Above photo: Debra Harry (IPCB)
|
Brazil
introduced its proposal on genetic use restriction technologies
(GURTs), noting that some terminator seeds may have medicinal or
other valuable properties.
|
|
The
Government of the Netherlands, through its Ministry for Development
Cooperation, signed an arrangement with the Secretariat of the Convention
on Biological Diversity to support the programme "CBD Secretariat
Activities" with 1,600,000 Euros.
Albert Moses, Consul General of the Netherlands, presented the Arrangement to
Hamdallah Zedan, CBD Executive Secretary, during the third Meeting
of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Inter-Sessional Working Group on Article
8(j) and Related Provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
|