See more coverage of this event on the main IISD ENB website
We have launched a new website to better share our reports of global environmental negotiations.
As well as current coverage of new negotiations, you can find our original reports from this event by clicking here.
Open-ended
intersessional meeting on the Strategic Plan, National Reports and the
implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity |
||
|
Delegates to the Open-ended Inter-sessional Meeting on the Strategic Plan, National Reports and Implementation (MSP) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) met in two working groups in the morning, in a brief afternoon Plenary to review progress, and in one working group in the afternoon. Working Group I (WG-I), on the strategic plan, discussed operational goals and a section on communication. Working Group II (WG-II) addressed national reports and continued work on implementation and operations of the Convention. Above photo: Delegates from the EU in a coordination huddle. |
. |
|
|
|
||
PLENARY: |
||
|
||
Delegates to the Open-ended Inter-sessional
Meeting on the Strategic Plan, National Reports and Implementation (MSP)
of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) met in two working groups in
the morning, in a brief afternoon Plenary to review progress, and in one
working group in the afternoon. Working Group I (WG-I), on the strategic
plan, discussed operational goals and a section on communication. Working
Group II (WG-II) addressed national reports and continued work on
implementation and operations of the Convention. Above photos L-R: Elaine Fisher (JAMAICA) Chair of WG-II and Peter Schei (NORWAY) Chair of WG-I reporting to plenary on the progress made within the two Working Groups. |
||
WORKING
GROUP I – STRATEGIC PLAN |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
ARGENTINA and BRAZIL (right) disagreed and a group was formed to draft compromise language. The agreed-upon language states that the CBD is playing a leadership role on international biodiversity issues in cooperation |
||
Regarding language on assessing, inventorying and recognizing traditional knowledge, NAMIBIA (left) called for reference to the involvement and prior informed consent of local and indigenous communities. |
||
WORKING GROUP II |
||
In a morning session, Working Group II discussed national reports and reviewed draft texts on operations and implementation of the Convention. |
||
NATIONAL REPORTS: | ||
|
||
|
||
ERITREA (left) stressed timely release of GEF funding in order to avoid delays in reporting. |
||
OPERATIONS OF THE CONVENTION: | ||
|
||
|
||
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION: | ||
With regard to development of NBSAPs, COLOMBIA (right), supported by others, stressed the importance of consulting with indigenous and local communities. MEXICO noted the need for innovative ways to facilitate within-country tracking of implementation. |
||
ENB writer in training: | ||
Below and left photos: Veit Koester (DENMARK) (second from left) began his successful tryout as an ENB writer. | ||
ENB writers (L-R): Teya Penniman, Changbo Bai, and Jacob Andersen | ||
|
© 2001, IISD. All rights reserved. |
|